“We do all of the...torture flights."
Bob Overby, Managing Director of Boeing Subsidiary Jeppesen International Trip Planning during a corporate meeting,
per a Jeppesen employee at the meeting. From a 10/30/06 New Yorker magazine article by Jane Mayer ( http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/30/061030ta_talk_mayer ). The Jeppesen employee bothered by Boeing doing these torture flights recalled Overby saying of the torture flights,
“It certainly pays well." What I have not heard from anyone about this news is the obvious--how
did Boeing keep this story from being widely covered before the ACLU recently mentioned it? Imagine how employees
in the noted meeting felt when the manager mentioned that they did the torture flights as noted in the article. Was there
an personnel issue the manager was hoping to solve by mentioning this? Low productivity? A union contract coming up?
I guess, depending on the context of this purported comment in the meeting, The old Mafia tactic of putting severed horse
heads in people's beds that they wanted to give a not so subtle hint to so they did what the Mafia wanted them to
do may have been improved upon by Boeing's subsidiary. In fact, doing these torture flights may have motivational effects
throughout the Boeing enterprise. All an unethical manager would have to do to motivate an employee to do anything would be
to drop a suggestion--serious or not--that they would be put on such a flight if they didn't do what the manager wanted them
to do. The employee couldn't even notify the police about the threat as even cases of torture of innocent people under
this program have been thrown out of court because our government claimed such a trial would divulge state secrets. Since
when did state secrets extend to crimes by the government and those that were accomplices to those crimes? Hopefully the Supreme
Court won't allow such state secrets claims to be used to prevent justice. Anyway, these torture flights give new meaning
to the below quote. Could the Corporate Security Manager who said that to me have known about these flights or other things
about Boeing as chilling or more so? I doubt it, but you never know. After the above quote, my statement on this site that
the Boeing/FAA fraud I witnessed was the bloodiest skeleton left in Boeing's closet may, chillingly, not be entirely true
if taken literally.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Boeing is the most arrogant company on the face of the planet." Boeing Corporate Investigations Manager in an interview
with me, May 19th, 2006.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Our leadership and some of our members grew arrogant in their own power, and with arrogance comes corruption,"
said Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.), a member of the class of 1994.
No special reason for the above Rep. Wamp quote, other than I read it today and it ties in with the top quote, and I
agree with Rep. Wamp's quote that "with arrogance comes corruption," as I witnessed at Boeing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"[The gyrochip] is a low-value card that they could find other ways to buy," he said. "If they want to buy a
737 to pull that part out, I'd love them to buy more 737s." From a January 2005 interview of David Wang, president
of Boeing China, showing Boeing's continuing views on the lack of importance of export law compliance which keeps parts
that may be used against us militarily out of our potential enemies' arsenals, when more bottom line dollars can be made by
intentionally violating those laws critical to national security, from a Seattle Times article, "State Department
goes after Boeing," July 6, 2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm rollerstamping--that's what they
want." A quote from a fellow inspector at BCA, stamping a thick stack of jobs off with abandon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You Gotta Do What You Gotta Do." "Advice" from a Boeing attorney to me in October 2003, on what my next steps
were after the Boeing Company essentially decided to hide behind the sham investigation by the FAA of my report, and
not correct the corruption within the company this site is about.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"My stamp’s got a Briggs and Stratton on it---I’ll buy anything." A quote from one of my Lead Inspectors
alluding that he rollerstamped so fast it was as if his "inspection" stamp had a gas powered lawn mower engine
attached to it to boost its "rollerstamping RPMs."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"(My QA Supervisor) said that no matter how much I inspected, that I would not find everything. I agreed (I had known
about Juran’s Quality Handbook for quite some time, that states, when products are inspected, that inspectors only catch
80% of defects--although I’m pretty sure the same handbook probably states (I have never read it, only heard about the
80% rule) that 0% of defects are found if the product is not inspected)."
A quote from Boeing's last true inspector that I know of (me) from my first report to the FAA. This quote is very
important in that it shows the inaneness of uninformed and/or corrupt Boeing personnel's (especially those
in management) belief that it might be possible for an airplane with millions of parts to be built with Boeing's
current rollerstamping quality system and/or "self-inspection" (as I've seen it practiced at Boeing, it should
be called "self rollerstamping," instead) without defects, and therefore inspections of airplane details, assemblies,
and installations, even if required by regulation, can be rollerstamped without consequence. That widespread belief at
Boeing that required inspections of Boeing's airplanes have no value and just get in the way of slapping airplane parts
together ever faster and faster is obviously false as my quote above shows. Yet this falsehood is spread throughout Boeing
because it is used partially to "justify" Boeing's corrupt rollerstamping quality system. Of course, many corrupt
personnel at Boeing are not dumb enough to believe this (they are just corrupt). They (as the QA supervisor in the above
quote was) know that their surreptitious training of their inspectors to rollerstamp instead of inspect will result
in vastly more misconfigurations and defects delivering to customers than would otherwise be the case if Boeing followed FAA
regulations and actually fully inspected their airplanes as required. They also know some of those defects will
likely be safety critical to the continued flight of the airplane at some point in service. However, the bottom line at
Boeing (and their annual merit bonuses) demands that they coerce their inspectors into rollerstamping, as my supervisor was
attempting to do in the above quote. There is another falsehood foisted upon inspectors to get them to rollerstamp
that is also evident in the above quote--effectively stating, "no matter how much we inspect, we will never find everything,
so why bother trying to inspect Boeing airplanes at all?" As you can see, Boeing management uses whatever methods
it can (even deceit and coercion) to get the unethical and/or illegal behavior it wants from employees (in this case
rollerstamping of work as acceptable when it never was actually inspected).
